Nurse-Family Partnership benefits children and mothers facing adversities, study shows

New findings from the Children’s Health Policy Centre’s scientific evaluation of the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) program show promising benefits for mothers regarding exposure to intimate partner violence, income, mental health and self-efficacy — warranting follow up of longer-term benefits across childhood.

The scientific team behind the BC Healthy Connections Project, or BCHCP, published these findings in the British Medical Journal Open. According to the study, NFP may help reduce adversities faced by mothers, including intimate partner violence, by the time their children are two years old.

For children, exposure to intimate partner violence is a serious form of maltreatment with long-term mental health consequences. Intimate partner violence is occurring at epidemic proportions, and rates are higher for lone mothers experiencing marginalization. Yet despite known harms to both children and mothers, efforts often focus on aftercare rather than prevention.

“These are important, encouraging findings on how to address early adversities,” said Nicole Catherine, BCHCP co-principal investigator, who holds the Canada Research Chair in Child Health Equity and Policy, Tier II. “We need greater investments in early prevention — well before children are born.”

BCHCP co-principal investigator Charlotte Waddell added that this landmark initiative has been a long-term priority for researchers in British Columbia (BC). It commenced in 2011 as the BC government prioritized early prevention of childhood adversities — leading to the BCHCP (2011-2022). “Our findings contribute further evidence that intervening in early childhood is a powerful policy mechanism to promote healthy child development,” said Waddell.

The Children’s Health Policy Centre (CHPC) at Simon Fraser University led the BCHCP randomized controlled trial, or RCT, in collaboration with McMaster University and other organizations.

A province-wide initiative, the BCHCP intended to address long-term child health inequities beginning before children were born. To do this, the trial was embedded within BC’s universal public health system. Four participating regional health authorities — Fraser, Interior, Island and Vancouver Coastal — were responsible for trial referrals, nursing and program costs. All five health authorities, including Northern Health, participated in a pilot nurse-guiding study and an adjunctive nurse-process evaluation. “BC showed tremendous leadership and foresight in investing in prevention of early childhood adversities,” said Catherine.

The study team was centrally located at the Children’s Health Policy Centre and supported scientific field interviewers across all four regional health authorities. Catherine provided scientific interviewers with intensive training and mentorship to ensure successful reach and sustained engagement with 739 pregnant girls and young women and their 737 children during each family’s 2.5-year participation.

The study included 200 Indigenous (including First Nations, Métis or Inuit) girls and young women. Making up 27% of the total participants, they generously agreed to participate in this long-term trial. Some 237 BCHCP children, or 32%, had an Indigenous mother or father.

“We are grateful to the participants for sharing their experiences with us while preparing to parent for the first time. Many shared how they wanted to make a difference for other children and mothers in similar circumstances,” said Catherine. Previous BCHCP reports have shown the strengths of the participants in seeking prenatal services while coping with cumulative adversities such as unstable housing and living on less than $10,000 per year.

The study was funded by the BC Ministries of Health, and Children and Family Development. The Mowafaghian and Stern Foundations provided additional generous supports.

Nurse-Family Partnership aims to improve the lives of children born to young, first-time mothers. The program focuses on families dealing with socioeconomic inequities. It begins in pregnancy and involves a program of home visits by public health nurses, continuing until children are two years old. NFP was developed in the United States by researcher David Olds and colleagues.

Earlier findings from the BCHCP research team had shown that NFP reduced prenatal substance exposure (nicotine and cannabis) and improved child mental health and language development by age two years. The BCHCP also involved an adjunctive biomarker sub-study.

“There is increasing interest and policy investments in delivering enhanced early prevention programs such as NFP in BC and Canada — all with expectations of sustained benefits. But we have yet to see if these benefits at age two years translate into sustained benefits across childhood and adolescence. This is where we will see the true value of intervening early,” Catherine said. “We are eager to re-engage the BCHCP children to see how they are doing and whether these investments made a difference in children’s lives, and to understand if they were cost-effective.”

Text of the BMJ Open paper is available here.

Media

For more information and contact details, please see the SFU News media release.

Effects of nurse-home visiting on intimate partner violence and maternal income, mental health and self-efficacy by 24 months postpartum: A randomised controlled trial

Catherine, N.L.A., MacMillan, H., Jack, S., Zheng, Y., Xie, H., Boyle, M., Sheehan, D., Gonzalez, A., Gafni, A., Tonmyr, L., Barr, R., Marcellus, L., Varcoe, C., & Waddell, C. (2025). Effects of nurse-home visiting on intimate partner violence and maternal income, mental health and self-efficacy by 24 months postpartum: a randomised controlled trial (British Columbia Healthy Connections Project). BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083147

Continue reading

CHPC scholars receive funding to support evaluation of “upstream” public health initiatives

A team of researchers led by Children’s Health Policy Centre scholars Kimberly Thomson and Nicole Catherine has received a 2024 Convening and Collaborating (C2) Award from Michael Smith Health Research BC. The award funding will help the research team improve the evaluation of upstream public health interventions in British Columbia.

Public health interventions are more effective when they address the bigger picture of people’s lives — the social conditions in which they are born, live, and age. These “upstream” interventions aim to tackle the root causes of health problems, addressing systemic inequities that traditional healthcare approaches may overlook. But the impacts of these interventions can be difficult to measure.

Thomson and Catherine will address this challenge by facilitating a series of conversations between policymakers, researchers and health practitioners. Through online consultations and an in-person Thought Exchange event, they will bring together researchers and research users to discuss the evaluation of upstream public health projects in BC.

The goal of these conversations is to help participants:

  • better understand current evaluation methods
  • identify opportunities for coordination between public health researchers and institutions
  • improve innovation and evaluation capacity
  • set future research priorities

“We’re really excited to have these rich discussions with our public health partners,” said Thomson. “It’s a great opportunity to shape our collaborative research priorities, including for upcoming child health policy initiatives in BC that we’ll be measuring and monitoring.”

The C2 Award supports researchers in British Columbia who are working collaboratively to address public health challenges. More information about the project and the award can be found on the Michael Smith Health Research BC website.

Home visiting programs lead to positive outcomes for children and mothers

A recent report by the Children’s Health Policy Centre found that home visiting programs can have significant benefits for mothers and children facing adversity.

The report looked at randomized controlled trial evaluations of 13 home visiting programs across Canada, the U.S. and other high-income jurisdictions to investigate the effectiveness of these programs. Seven intensive programs based on the Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) model demonstrated particularly robust benefits.

The benefits for children included:

  • reduced prenatal substance exposure
  • improved language
  • improved cognitive development
  • better mental health
  • better school readiness and reading
  • fewer injuries or maltreatment concerns

Benefits for mothers included:

  • better social supports
  • greater self-efficacy
  • fewer subsequent pregnancies
  • increased breastfeeding duration
  • better mental health
  • improved parenting
  • improved socioeconomic status
  • reduced exposure to intimate partner violence

NFP is an early intervention where nurses visit girls and women through pregnancy and their child’s early years. Nurses explore topics such as healthy pregnancy, parenting skills, healthy relationships and child development.

The report also identified six other home visiting programs that benefitted children and mothers. However, these programs had fewer positive outcomes than the NFP-based programs due to shorter durations, later interventions and the varied skill levels of providers.

These findings provide critical evidence that policymakers in British Columbia can use to build on the success of existing programs, develop new intervention strategies and ensure that children and mothers flourish.

To learn more, read the full report.

Effective Home Visiting Programs for Children and Mothers Experiencing Adversities

Catherine N, Barican J, White O, Tang J, Thomson K, & Waddell C (2024). Effective Home Visiting Programs for Children and Mothers Experiencing Adversities. Vancouver, British Columbia: Children’s Health Policy Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University.

Executive Summary

This report aimed to identify research evidence for British Columbia (BC) policymakers on the best options for home visiting with children and mothers experiencing adversity. We first used systematic review methods to identify randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluations. This approach almost exclusively uncovered intensive nurse home visiting programs similar to or based on Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP). We therefore supplemented our methods by scanning RCT-backed home visiting interventions recommended by the United States (US) Department of Health and Human Services through its Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) program. The systematic review identified seven NFP-informed programs, some with important variations. The supplemental scan identified six additional programs that varied by provider, intensity and duration. We identified 13 relevant programs in total.

The NFP-based home visiting programs included: Family Nurse Partnership (England); Minding the Baby (US); NFP (US); NFP (BC); and VoorZorg (Netherlands). Two other programs entailed adaptations.

ProKind (Germany) involved delivery solely by midwives and social workers, while right@home (Australia) included multiparous mothers. Minding the Baby and right@home were also delivered by social workers in addition to nurses. All seven programs started in pregnancy and continued until children were age two — approximately 2.5 years duration.

The US MIECHV scan included NFP-based programs as well as other kinds of home visiting including: Child First; Family Check-Up; Healthy Families America; Play and Learning Strategies; Promoting First Relationships; and Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting. Providers ranged from community workers to master’s-trained clinicians. Start times also varied — ranging from prenatally to anytime from birth to age seven years. Program duration ranged from only six visits to three to five years.

The seven intensive NFP-related programs led to a comprehensive array of positive outcomes for both children and mothers — including many benefits that emerged later, across childhood and adolescence. The six other programs also led to benefits.

Evaluation is critical to ensure that new and ongoing public investments make a positive difference in the lives of children and mothers — particularly for those who are facing more adversities than others. BC has an opportunity to build on its extensive leadership and experience with delivering NFP and other prevention programs for children — to adapt existing research-informed programs to local needs and to conduct innovative evaluations to ensure effectiveness. The 13 programs we have outlined here all show benefits for children and mothers — some more robust and enduring than others. In choosing among the trade-offs, the main goal must be to ensure the flourishing of all children in this province, and therefore to choose programs that will meet this goal.

Read the full report

World Children’s Day promotes children’s rights

Established by the United Nations in 1954, World Children’s Day, Nov 20, promotes and celebrates children’s rights.

Each year, UNICEF, the United Nations Children’s Fund, helps organize kids’ takeovers in which children “take over” high-visibility roles in politics, sports and media. This allows kids to raise their voices on issues that matter to them, including climate change, mental health and education.

World Children’s Day also shines a light on international agreements made to protect the rights of children, including the Declaration of the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Rights of the Child — adopted on Nov. 20 in 1959 and 1989, respectively. The day calls on world leaders to honour and uphold the rights enshrined in those agreements.

Access to high-quality health care — including mental health care — is one of those rights. But many children in Canada do not have easy access to effective programs for preventing mental disorders. Effective treatments that involve self-delivery may be one way to improve capacity. To learn more, see Vol. 14, No. 2 of the Children’s Mental Health Research Quarterly.

 

Social support can promote young people’s emotional health

Social supports may be universally beneficial for adolescents, according to a paper recently published in the Journal of Adolescence.

Written by researchers including Kim Thomson, an assistant professor of Health Sciences at Simon Fraser University and a CHPC team member, the paper tracked the emotional health of immigrant, refugee and non-immigrant early adolescents in British Columbia.

The study found that immigrant and refugee adolescents across 10 school districts started Grade 4 with poorer emotional health than their peers, highlighting the need for culturally responsive supports for these students. From Grades 4 to 7, both immigrant and non-immigrant adolescents experienced a decline in their emotional health.

However, first-generation refugees were a notable exception — they reported feeling more satisfied with life over the same time.

Despite the differences in emotional health between the groups, Thomson and her co-authors “did not find differences in the associations between improvements in emotional health and improvements in social support by immigration group.” This indicates that social supports may benefit all adolescents regardless of their immigration backgrounds.

“These results highlight social support as a modifiable factor within schools that can promote young people’s emotional health,” the study concluded.

To learn more, read the full paper.