New studies offer additional evidence about Nurse-Family Partnership

Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) — a program aimed at improving the health and development of disadvantaged children — has shown an impressive record in the US for more than 30 years.

In long-term studies in Elmira, New York, Memphis, Tennessee and Denver, Colorado, it improved parenting, improved children’s behaviour and learning, and helped mothers achieve economic self-sufficiency, among other benefits.

Now NFP is being tested in other countries and the results are starting to appear. Results in BC — where NFP is being tested for the first time in Canada — won’t be available for several years. But meanwhile, researchers in the Netherlands have also had positive findings.

As reported in three peer-reviewed journal articles in Midwifery and PLOS ONE, the program has been shown to reduce prenatal smoking, increase breastfeeding, and improve child and family safety.

As the Dutch authors observed: “The results of this randomized controlled trial…corroborate the positive effects of this type of intervention that have been shown in NFP trials conducted in the US.”

In England, on the other hand, NFP has not shown the same impact.  In fact, the Lancet has just published an article outlining limited benefits for children and families who received Family-Nurse Partnership (the UK-adapted version of NFP) compared with existing services.  There, researchers studied prenatal nicotine use, subsequent pregnancies at 24 months postpartum, infant birth weight and child emergency room encounters for all causes. The Lancet has also included a commentary on the English findings by David Olds, NFP’s founder.

Charlotte Waddell, who is the co-principal investigator for BC’s NFP evaluation, says, “Every country is different.  For example, public health spending and other kinds of social supports vary a lot, which can influence how effective a new intervention may appear to be.”

“But this is exactly why we’re conducting a trial in BC — to learn how well NFP works in BC and Canada,” Waddell says.

As to whether the effort and expense of this kind of evaluation is worth it, Waddell has no doubts. “Our aim is to improve the lives of children in BC.  This trial is the best way to find out if NFP should be an important part of this.”

To read the three articles on the Dutch trial results please see the following:
Science Direct
Plos One: 2015
Plos One: 2013

To read the article on the English trial results please see the Lancet.

To read David Olds’ commentary on the English trial results please see his article in the Lancet.

The English Family-Nurse Partnership Unit has also posted a response on their website.

 

Will ‘unique program’ succeed in Canada?

Harriet MacMillan sees the BC Healthy Connections Project (BCHCP) through a unique set of lenses.

One involves her role as the Chedoke Health Chair in Child Psychiatry at the Offord Centre for Child Studies at McMaster University. There, she co-led a Hamilton-based project piloting Nurse Family Partnership several years ago. Looking through that lens, she is eager to see Canadian young mothers-to-be get more help — via Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP). Basically, this program sees public health nurses frequently visiting young, pregnant women — in their own homes — from early in pregnancy until their children turn two years old.

Another lens comes from MacMillan’s position as BCHCP nominated co-principal investigator — along with Charlotte Waddell from Simon Fraser University. Here, MacMillan primarily wants to ensure the rigorous demands of a randomized controlled trial of NFP are met.

“I think it’s such an important study and it’s wonderful we have the opportunity to conduct this trial in BC,” she says. “The collaboration between the scientific team and the BC policy makers is terrific.”

In helping launch the Hamilton pilot project several years ago, MacMillan worked with a team adapting the American NFP materials to meet Canadian needs and standards. For example, in the US, each nurse is responsible for 25 young mothers-to-be. “In Canada, partly due to issues like geographic distance, we determined it should be no more than 20,” she says. As well, even though both countries support breast-feeding, “Canada tends to put a bigger emphasis on it.”

The pilot project also examined the whole referral process. MacMillan recalls: “We asked, are we able to get referrals and are we able to recruit women?” And once women did join the project, the team asked: “Do both the women and the nurses find NFP acceptable?” Indeed, the pilot project showed that NFP referrals were feasible, and that women and nurses both welcomed NFP.

“I think it’s fair to say that these young mothers were a high-risk group, but basically what we found was that once they were on board and engaged, they really seemed to appreciate the program.”

As for whether the program will succeed in Canada the answer remains to be seen. “My hope is that we will see similar benefits associated with NFP here as compared with the US trials,” MacMillan says.

“NFP is such a unique program where nurses develop this special relationship with mothers prenatally, such that mothers become very tuned in to the needs of their child, and so we hope it will improve outcomes for both mothers and their children.”

Note that Nurse-Family Partnership is available only through the BC Healthy Connections Project for the duration of study recruitment. Practitioners or young pregnant women can click here for more information.

Midwife supports study in the hope of helping young moms-to-be

As a midwife in the Okanagan Valley, Suzanne Lobb sees pregnant women who fit every description – from younger to older, from poor to wealthy, and from many different cultural backgrounds. But regardless of their background, each woman receives the same initial message. “We give everyone a card and encourage them to call public health,” Lobb says. “Once they’re out of our care — six weeks after they deliver — it’s easier for them to stay connected to services in the community if they have a stronger connection to public health.”

In the Okanagan Valley, Lobb works with a number of women who are either “young, transient or single parents.” The key issue she identifies is solo-parenting, sometimes because the women’s partners need to leave the community to find sustainable jobs. “There’s also a large number of very young, very transient women who are single parents,” she says, referring to women who often have to move from place to place because they have no home of their own. “And a lot of dads are in and out of the picture,” she adds. Apart from everything else, this often means that the women don’t have the emotional support they need.

That’s one of the reasons why Lobb is a big believer in the BC Healthy Connections Project. “I support the study because I think it’s important to know whether Nurse-Family Partnership is effective,” she says. In her own practice she’s noticed that young women who sometimes have to miss midwifery appointments can often still attend support groups offered by other community-based organizations. “That kind of support is really valuable to those young women,” she says, adding that one-on-one assistance provided by a nurse might be even more effective.

As a mother of three, herself Lobb delivers almost 50 babies each year. She wants to see all of them grow into healthy, happy adults. “I really want to see the study succeed,” she says.

Note that Nurse-Family Partnership is available only through the BC Healthy Connections Project for the duration of study recruitment. Practitioners or young pregnant women can click here for more information.

Qualitative study on autism published

The Children’s Health Policy Centre has just finished a national qualitative study looking at the singular influence of parents of children with autism on the policy process in Canada – and the lessons to be learned in improving services for children with other kinds of mental health and developmental difficulties. Full text of this article is available here.

‘We all have the same concerns…’

As a scientific interviewer, Elsa Langdon* now regularly meets with people she wouldn’t otherwise have the privilege of knowing.

Her role, as part of the BC Healthy Connections Project (BCHCP) — a scientific study evaluating the Nurse-Family Partnership program — puts her face to face with young women who’ve dealt with a variety of life experiences. Some have not always had all the supports they needed. Some are living on low income. Some have struggled with finishing school, or with health problems. And now they’re pregnant for the first time.

An intensive child and maternal health program, Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) gives young women who are preparing to parent for the first time one-on-one home visits with public health nurses throughout their pregnancy. These visits continue until children reach their second birthday. The BCHCP is the first Canadian scientific evaluation of this program.

Says Langdon: “It’s been amazing to me to see how strong these women are. Despite all the challenges they face, they still have so much hope for the future. That’s had a big impact on me.”

Langdon’s job is to speak with all participants in the study (only 50% receive Nurse-Family Partnership; the remainder receive existing health and social services) and track their experiences about being new mothers over two-and-half years.

What has struck Langdon the most is how much she has in common with these women. “A realization that’s been slowly washing over me is this sense of how similar we all are,” she says. “If you read about their lives on a piece of paper you may think, ‘They’re so different from me. We have nothing in common.’ But when I sit down and talk [to them], I realize they have the same worries, the same concerns that I do.”

She has also been surprised by the enthusiasm of the participants. “At the beginning I didn’t expect that,” she says. “We were taking up a lot of time and asking a lot of questions. I thought we’d be more of a burden.” Instead, the women taking part often express their gratitude, saying that being in the study gives them a voice. One young woman, in particular, said it made her “feel she was part of something that was bigger,” Langdon says. “It was great to know she saw it as a positive thing.”

Note that Nurse-Family Partnership is available only through the BC Healthy Connections Project for the duration of recruitment. Practitioners or young pregnant women can click here for details on how to reach public health and determine eligibility for the BCHCP.

Improving Children’s Mental Health: Six highly effective psychosocial interventions

This research report was prepared in May 2015 at the request of the BC Ministry of Children and Family Development. It aims to inform policymaking by providing a review of highly effective Children’s mental health psychosocial prevention and treatment interventions — based on randomized-controlled trial evidence of benefits in young people as well as policy feasibility. Continue reading

Learning from young mothers

When a public health nurse discovered that a young mom in the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) program was reading the book Getting Things Done, by productivity expert David Allen, she was surprised.

But that’s exactly what makes the program so unique and valuable, says nursing supervisor Amanda Nazari.*

An intensive child and maternal health program, Nurse-Family Partnership provides selected first-time moms with one-on-one home visits with public health nurses throughout their pregnancy. The visits continue until children reach their second birthday.

“This nurse had shared with me how incredible it was to visit this participant,” Nazari says. A “profoundly contemplative person” who gives her own life tremendous thought, the mom had started to read the book and incorporate some of the principles into her own life. Then she shared what she had learned with her nurse.

“For the nurse, that makes it learning too,” Nazari notes. “In NFP we talk about the parallel process. Sometimes it’s about participants’ lives and their journeys. But at other times they have things to teach us.”

Nazari particularly appreciates what she describes as her own “vicarious experiences” with young moms, through the six nurses she supervises. “The whole basis of NFP is that it’s such a terrific opportunity to support these young women,” Nazari says.

Note that NFP is available only through the BC Healthy Connections Project (BCHCP) for the duration of recruitment. Practitioners or young pregnant women can click here for details on how to reach public health and determine eligibility for the BCHCP.

* Name has been changed to protect privacy.

Helping BC’s children meet their potential

Charlotte Waddell believes children are so important that society should ensure their wellbeing even before they are born. So, together with a large team of research and policy collaborators, she is studying the effectiveness of the landmark Nurse-Family Partnership program in Canada for the first time. The study is called the BC Healthy Connections Project (BCHCP).

Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) is a home visiting program. It involves public health nurses providing intensive supports to disadvantaged young women who are preparing to parent for the first time. Visits start early in pregnancy and continue until children reach their second birthday. The young women develop long-term relationships with the nurses, which is a crucial part of how the program works.

The BCHCP involves a randomized controlled trial of the program’s impact – looking at mothers’ wellbeing, and at children’s health and development from birth through age two. In essence, the research team will compare NFP with BC’s existing maternal and child health and social services.

BC’s participating Health Authorities are seeking 1,000 mothers and children to take part in the BCHCP over the next two years. But beyond this, Waddell hopes that the research team can follow these children and families for 10 years or more. The goal? To look at mental health and development as children progress through early, middle childhood and into their adolescent years.

“We know from US studies that many program benefits actually show up much later – in 10, 15 or 20 years,” Waddell says. “So, in a sense, completing the immediate evaluation of Nurse-Family Partnership is just the first step.”

For example, the team would like to learn whether Nurse-Family Partnership helps prevent kids from developing serious anxiety, depression, behaviour and substance misuse problems. As well, the team is curious about how Nurse-Family Partnership might affect academic achievement – from school entry into the high school years. There are other potential benefits, too, such as reducing the number of children going into foster care – and even reducing mortality for children and mothers.

Beyond these potential benefits for children, it may turn out that Nurse-Family Partnership is a good fiscal investment. In the US, NFP has shown a return on investment of more than $18,000 for every family served. This includes savings across healthcare, income support, youth justice, child protection and other public sectors. “So we’re setting the stage to test cost effectiveness, too.”

But the real reason to care? Says Waddell: “It’s about making sure that all BC children have the chance to flourish and meet their potential.”

Note that NFP is available only through the BC Healthy Connections Project for the duration of recruitment. Practitioners or young pregnant women can click here for details on eligibility for the BCHCP.

Richmond doctor supports close collaboration with public health

As a family doctor who delivers babies in Richmond, BC, Tamara Leung (pictured adjacent) has seen her share of difficult pregnancies. Maybe a woman is new to the community or hasn’t had a doctor involved. Maybe she’s really young and has very few people supporting her. Perhaps she has very little money to cover the everyday costs of living.

But Leung knows her first step: “I try to send everyone to public health” — meaning those community-based health programs that focus, among other things, on promoting health and preventing problems for pregnant women.

Leung particularly likes intensive home visiting programs, such as Nurse-Family Partnership, because they support women throughout the pregnancy and into children’s early years — in their own homes. This allows nurses to understand the real situation that women are living in. “When people are out in public or come into a clinic, you don’t always see the challenges they may face in the home,” Leung says. “They need support and help. The isolation that so many have is heartbreaking.”

However, Leung says that even people who want to help sometimes inadvertently create more problems. As an example, she recalls the time a school wanted to sponsor a family from a transition house. Their intentions were well-meaning. But the organizers made an enormous basket and the woman receiving it ended up having to carry it home on the bus.

As for the women Leung refers to public health, she says she understands that Nurse-Family Partnership is currently being evaluated in comparison with existing health and social services. This evaluation — called the BC Healthy Connections Project — is taking place across BC over the next several years and is looking at children’s mental health and development as well as maternal outcomes. Leung knows that this evaluation, involving a randomized controlled trial, must be rigorous to help us understand how well the program can work in BC. “We need to follow the basic rules of science,” she says.

“And regardless of whether my patients end up receiving NFP or other public health services while this study is going on, I’m happy,” she says. “I just want them better connected with public health. All pregnant women can still benefit from public health support.”