Working to enhance children’s mental health

“For the One and the Many,” is the title of talk given by Children’s Health Policy director, Charlotte Waddell.

Delivered in March 2016 to practitioners at BC Children’s Hospital and in April 2016 to managers at the BC Ministry for Children and Family Development, the talk focuses on the mental health challenges facing many young people in British Columbia today.

In addition to examining the prevalence of various disorders — ranging from anxiety to substance misuse to autism — the talk also tracks health spending in Canada, showing how children’s mental health programs are languishing, even as overall health spending rises. As well, the talk explores effective prevention programs and new alternatives for children such as the Nurse-Family Partnership program.

A complete slide show for the talk may be viewed here.

Helping children by working “upstream”

upstreamHealth policymakers and practitioners often use words like “downstream” or “upstream” to describe the vastly different points at which people may receive care.

Downstream means late in the process, well after the onset of a problem, and often long after a problem has become entrenched. For example, a child who is treated for an anxiety disorder — even if that treatment is successful — is getting help downstream.

But give the child a prevention program, before they have a disorder, and you’ve moved “upstream.” And in doing this, a few things can happen. You can immediately improve the quality of the child’s life — by reducing their distress and removing impediments to their healthy development. You can also alter the trajectory of a young child’s life, by reducing the negative impact of adversity. In turn, this can contribute to a lifetime of well-being and resilience. Upstream interventions can also save healthcare costs, for example, by reducing emergency room visits.

Better yet, you can help the mother as well as the child — before the child is even born. Then you’re moving upstream in way that’s likely to make the most profound difference.

That’s the motivation for Lenora Marcellus, pictured above, an Associate Professor in the School of Nursing at the University of Victoria. A member of the BC Healthy Connections Project scientific team, her original background is in neonatal intensive care. “A lot of the work I’ve done is downstream, when women haven’t been supported when they’ve needed it most, early on,” she says. She notes that much of her work in these hospital settings was with families who were struggling with disadvantages such as not having enough to live on, or not being able to get prevention programs themselves when they needed them.

Marcellus has also volunteered for almost 20 years with a young mothers’ group in her community and has seen first-hand the many challenges faced by young parents. Her experience providing downstream intensive healthcare services is what motivates her to embrace the goals of the BC Healthy Connections Project, which involves an evaluation of the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) program.

With NFP, public health nurses visit young women who are in early pregnancy and preparing to parent for the first time — providing them with home visits and intensive supports until the child’s second birthday. The program starts earlier than any other early childhood program, making it a decidedly upstream approach.

For the BC Healthy Connections’ evaluation, NFP is being compared with BC’s existing prenatal and early childhood services. The goal is to learn whether BC can replicate positive results from other countries. These results have shown that NFP can improve prenatal health, parenting, and children’s mental health and development, while also lifting young mothers out of poverty.

According to Marcellus, BC Health Authorities already try to help new moms with highly complex challenges, so they can help their children. But these families need extra supports and it’s often hard for them to get them. That’s why she’s so committed to the BC Health Connections Project.

“With NFP, the public health nurse brings a really unique set of skills,” Marcellus says of the program. “They’re developing a relationship and connecting with the new moms. What’s more, the meeting takes place in the mom’s own home or wherever feels safe for her. That’s very different from a professional setting.”

Although the teen pregnancy rate has declined in BC, young moms continue to be a vulnerable population because these very young women also have other challenges, Marcellus says. They can be invisible, stigmatized or judged. Just as bad, they often fall between the cracks when it comes to getting help. “We know that in society today it’s pretty hard to be an independent adult in our very expensive province,” Marcellus says.

“We could call it a pay now or pay later opportunity,” she says, adding that she would much rather see society pay now. “Investing in programs like NFP is likely to pay huge dividends over generations — for families and communities at large.”
The Nurse-Family Partnership is available only through the BC Healthy Connections Project for the duration of study recruitment. Practitioners or young pregnant women can click here for more information.

Examining the biological mechanisms that influence health

healthy foundations studyNurse-Family Partnership (NFP) is a prevention program that starts far earlier than most other public health interventions. It begins before children are even born — ideally by the 16th week of pregnancy. Its aim? To improve the lives of young mothers and their children. To achieve this, public health nurses make frequent home visits, building a trusting relationship with young first-time mothers and supporting them to nurture and protect their children.

NFP’s early start also presents a unique opportunity to study some of the biological mechanisms influencing health, starting even before birth. This is the subject of the Healthy Foundations Study, funded by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, being led by Andrea Gonzalez (pictured above), assistant professor with the Offord Centre for Child Studies at McMaster University. The study is being conducted in collaboration with the Children’s Health Policy Centre at Simon Fraser University – and in collaboration with the BC Ministries of Health and Children and Family Development and BC’s Fraser and Vancouver Coastal Health Authorities.

Associated with the BC Healthy Connections Project — BC’s scientific evaluation of NFP, funded by the BC Ministry of Health with support from the BC Ministry of Children and Family Development — the Healthy Foundations Study is examining biological markers of health outcomes for children over the first two years of life. By collecting hair samples, saliva and cheek swabs from infants and consenting mothers, Gonzalez will be able to track changes in stress responses and the way genes work.

We all encounter mild stressors every day — such as unexpected changes in plans, disagreements with friends, family or co‐workers, or losing something. And we all develop different ways to deal with these stressors. Through the Healthy Foundations Study, Gonzalez is hoping to learn how pregnancy and new motherhood may be stressful to the mothers, and how the babies may respond to this stress. The study is also looking at whether NFP may affect the way that moms and babies cope with stress, and how this may influence later infant development. So this study will compare outcomes for children whose mothers receive NFP coupled with existing services to those whose mothers receive existing services only.

“We think that experiences you’re exposed to as an infant may influence a whole host of health outcomes later on,” Andrea Gonzalez says. And NFP aims to improve outcomes for children, and for their families.

The Nurse-Family Partnership is available only through the BC Healthy Connections Project for the duration of study recruitment. Practitioners or young pregnant women can click here for more information.

New studies offer additional evidence about Nurse-Family Partnership

Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) — a program aimed at improving the health and development of disadvantaged children — has shown an impressive record in the US for more than 30 years.

In long-term studies in Elmira, New York, Memphis, Tennessee and Denver, Colorado, it improved parenting, improved children’s behaviour and learning, and helped mothers achieve economic self-sufficiency, among other benefits.

Now NFP is being tested in other countries and the results are starting to appear. Results in BC — where NFP is being tested for the first time in Canada — won’t be available for several years. But meanwhile, researchers in the Netherlands have also had positive findings.

As reported in three peer-reviewed journal articles in Midwifery and PLOS ONE, the program has been shown to reduce prenatal smoking, increase breastfeeding, and improve child and family safety.

As the Dutch authors observed: “The results of this randomized controlled trial…corroborate the positive effects of this type of intervention that have been shown in NFP trials conducted in the US.”

In England, on the other hand, NFP has not shown the same impact.  In fact, the Lancet has just published an article outlining limited benefits for children and families who received Family-Nurse Partnership (the UK-adapted version of NFP) compared with existing services.  There, researchers studied prenatal nicotine use, subsequent pregnancies at 24 months postpartum, infant birth weight and child emergency room encounters for all causes. The Lancet has also included a commentary on the English findings by David Olds, NFP’s founder.

Charlotte Waddell, who is the co-principal investigator for BC’s NFP evaluation, says, “Every country is different.  For example, public health spending and other kinds of social supports vary a lot, which can influence how effective a new intervention may appear to be.”

“But this is exactly why we’re conducting a trial in BC — to learn how well NFP works in BC and Canada,” Waddell says.

As to whether the effort and expense of this kind of evaluation is worth it, Waddell has no doubts. “Our aim is to improve the lives of children in BC.  This trial is the best way to find out if NFP should be an important part of this.”

To read the three articles on the Dutch trial results please see the following:
Science Direct
Plos One: 2015
Plos One: 2013

To read the article on the English trial results please see the Lancet.

To read David Olds’ commentary on the English trial results please see his article in the Lancet.

The English Family-Nurse Partnership Unit has also posted a response on their website.

 

Will ‘unique program’ succeed in Canada?

Harriet MacMillanHarriet MacMillan sees the BC Healthy Connections Project (BCHCP) through a unique set of lenses.

One involves her role as the Chedoke Health Chair in Child Psychiatry at the Offord Centre for Child Studies at McMaster University. There, she co-led a Hamilton-based project piloting Nurse Family Partnership several years ago. Looking through that lens, she is eager to see Canadian young mothers-to-be get more help — via Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP). Basically, this program sees public health nurses frequently visiting young, pregnant women — in their own homes — from early in pregnancy until their children turn two years old.

Another lens comes from MacMillan’s position as BCHCP nominated co-principal investigator — along with Charlotte Waddell from Simon Fraser University. Here, MacMillan primarily wants to ensure the rigorous demands of a randomized controlled trial of NFP are met.

“I think it’s such an important study and it’s wonderful we have the opportunity to conduct this trial in BC,” she says. “The collaboration between the scientific team and the BC policy makers is terrific.”

In helping launch the Hamilton pilot project several years ago, MacMillan worked with a team adapting the American NFP materials to meet Canadian needs and standards. For example, in the US, each nurse is responsible for 25 young mothers-to-be. “In Canada, partly due to issues like geographic distance, we determined it should be no more than 20,” she says. As well, even though both countries support breast-feeding, “Canada tends to put a bigger emphasis on it.”

The pilot project also examined the whole referral process. MacMillan recalls: “We asked, are we able to get referrals and are we able to recruit women?” And once women did join the project, the team asked: “Do both the women and the nurses find NFP acceptable?” Indeed, the pilot project showed that NFP referrals were feasible, and that women and nurses both welcomed NFP.

“I think it’s fair to say that these young mothers were a high-risk group, but basically what we found was that once they were on board and engaged, they really seemed to appreciate the program.”

As for whether the program will succeed in Canada the answer remains to be seen. “My hope is that we will see similar benefits associated with NFP here as compared with the US trials,” MacMillan says.

“NFP is such a unique program where nurses develop this special relationship with mothers prenatally, such that mothers become very tuned in to the needs of their child, and so we hope it will improve outcomes for both mothers and their children.”

Note that Nurse-Family Partnership is available only through the BC Healthy Connections Project for the duration of study recruitment. Practitioners or young pregnant women can click here for more information.

Midwife supports study in the hope of helping young moms-to-be

midwifeAs a midwife in the Okanagan Valley, Suzanne Lobb sees pregnant women who fit every description – from younger to older, from poor to wealthy, and from many different cultural backgrounds. But regardless of their background, each woman receives the same initial message. “We give everyone a card and encourage them to call public health,” Lobb says. “Once they’re out of our care — six weeks after they deliver — it’s easier for them to stay connected to services in the community if they have a stronger connection to public health.”

In the Okanagan Valley, Lobb works with a number of women who are either “young, transient or single parents.” The key issue she identifies is solo-parenting, sometimes because the women’s partners need to leave the community to find sustainable jobs. “There’s also a large number of very young, very transient women who are single parents,” she says, referring to women who often have to move from place to place because they have no home of their own. “And a lot of dads are in and out of the picture,” she adds. Apart from everything else, this often means that the women don’t have the emotional support they need.

That’s one of the reasons why Lobb is a big believer in the BC Healthy Connections Project. “I support the study because I think it’s important to know whether Nurse-Family Partnership is effective,” she says. In her own practice she’s noticed that young women who sometimes have to miss midwifery appointments can often still attend support groups offered by other community-based organizations. “That kind of support is really valuable to those young women,” she says, adding that one-on-one assistance provided by a nurse might be even more effective.

As a mother of three, herself Lobb delivers almost 50 babies each year. She wants to see all of them grow into healthy, happy adults. “I really want to see the study succeed,” she says.

Note that Nurse-Family Partnership is available only through the BC Healthy Connections Project for the duration of study recruitment. Practitioners or young pregnant women can click here for more information.

Qualitative study on autism published

The Children’s Health Policy Centre has just finished a national qualitative study looking at the singular influence of parents of children with autism on the policy process in Canada – and the lessons to be learned in improving services for children with other kinds of mental health and developmental difficulties. Full text of this article is available here.

‘We all have the same concerns…’

Nurse-family PartnershipAs a scientific interviewer, Elsa Langdon* now regularly meets with people she wouldn’t otherwise have the privilege of knowing.

Her role, as part of the BC Healthy Connections Project (BCHCP) — a scientific study evaluating the Nurse-Family Partnership program — puts her face to face with young women who’ve dealt with a variety of life experiences. Some have not always had all the supports they needed. Some are living on low income. Some have struggled with finishing school, or with health problems. And now they’re pregnant for the first time.

An intensive child and maternal health program, Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) gives young women who are preparing to parent for the first time one-on-one home visits with public health nurses throughout their pregnancy. These visits continue until children reach their second birthday. The BCHCP is the first Canadian scientific evaluation of this program.

Says Langdon: “It’s been amazing to me to see how strong these women are. Despite all the challenges they face, they still have so much hope for the future. That’s had a big impact on me.”

Langdon’s job is to speak with all participants in the study (only 50% receive Nurse-Family Partnership; the remainder receive existing health and social services) and track their experiences about being new mothers over two-and-half years.

What has struck Langdon the most is how much she has in common with these women. “A realization that’s been slowly washing over me is this sense of how similar we all are,” she says. “If you read about their lives on a piece of paper you may think, ‘They’re so different from me. We have nothing in common.’ But when I sit down and talk [to them], I realize they have the same worries, the same concerns that I do.”

She has also been surprised by the enthusiasm of the participants. “At the beginning I didn’t expect that,” she says. “We were taking up a lot of time and asking a lot of questions. I thought we’d be more of a burden.” Instead, the women taking part often express their gratitude, saying that being in the study gives them a voice. One young woman, in particular, said it made her “feel she was part of something that was bigger,” Langdon says. “It was great to know she saw it as a positive thing.”

Note that Nurse-Family Partnership is available only through the BC Healthy Connections Project for the duration of recruitment. Practitioners or young pregnant women can click here for details on how to reach public health and determine eligibility for the BCHCP.

Improving Children’s Mental Health: Six highly effective psychosocial interventions

This research report was prepared in May 2015 at the request of the BC Ministry of Children and Family Development. It aims to inform policymaking by providing a review of highly effective Children’s mental health psychosocial prevention and treatment interventions — based on randomized-controlled trial evidence of benefits in young people as well as policy feasibility. Continue reading