Dr. Nicole Catherine appointed Director of the Children’s Health Policy Centre at SFU

We are delighted to announce that Dr. Nicole Catherine has been appointed Director of the Children’s Health Policy Centre as of May 1, 2026. Nicole is Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Health Sciences at SFU and holds the Canada Research Chair in Child Health Equity and Policy, Tier 2. She has been a member of the Centre’s senior leadership team since 2012.

Nicole leads a program of research centred on understanding how early prevention programs can support children and families who are experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage and on informing public policies to better meet their needs.

Her work builds on her leadership of the BC Healthy Connections Project, a BC-wide randomized controlled trial evaluating an enhanced child health home visiting program. The program involved frequent support visits from public health nurses to expectant mothers and their children throughout pregnancy and early childhood.

Program benefits shown through the trial — including improving child mental health and language and reducing exposure to intimate partner violence by age two years — continue to inform how early prevention programs are being adapted and evaluated locally in Fraser Health Authority and province wide. Nicole is currently the lead investigator or co-investigator on multiple studies designed to help policy leaders ensure effective child health programming.

As an educator, Nicole’s teaching focuses on child wellbeing and public policy. She also collaborates closely with policymakers, public health practitioners, Indigenous scholars and community organizations to ensure that her research is used to inform better services and supports for children and families in BC and beyond.

“I’m excited to grow the Centre’s work and expand its impact in the years ahead,” says Nicole.

“The Centre plays a unique role in advancing child health equity and policy. As Director, I look forward to further strengthening our team and partnerships so that research evidence continues to support policies that help children flourish.”

We also thank Dr. Charlotte Waddell, our Founding Director, for her many contributions to child health research and policy. Charlotte will continue supporting the Centre in the role of Associate Director.

Since founding the Centre in 2007, Charlotte has played an essential role in shaping its mission and profile. With others, she secured millions of dollars in funding to grow the Centre’s work, establishing it as a unique and influential voice in child health policy research in Canada.

Charlotte co-led the BC Healthy Connections Project with Nicole and others. With the Centre team, Charlotte also led the Children’s Mental Health Research Quarterly project (2007–2025). This project provided systematic review evidence summarizing the best available research on children’s mental health prevention and treatment interventions for policymakers and practitioners, along with providing regular policy consultations and public talks. Charlotte also supports the Nuu-Chah-Nulth Tribal Council’s long-term research project, Hishuk-ish Tsawalk, among other projects.

Nicole embodies our Centre’s focus on improving child wellbeing by producing high-quality research for informing policy and practice. As Charlotte says, “We look forward to the Centre growing and going strong under Nicole’s leadership — doing research that makes a difference in children’s lives.”

Adverse childhood experiences increase opioid misuse risk

A large study of Americans aged 18 and older pointed to the role of adverse childhood experiences in the development of opioid use disorder. Researchers surveyed more than 36,000 individuals who were representative of the US population, asking about their experiences with 10 different forms of early adversity, such as childhood physical abuse, and their prescription opioid use as adolescents and adults. They found that early adverse experiences significantly increased the odds for misusing prescription opioids at or before age 17 and the odds for ever being diagnosed with opioid use disorder. And opioid risk rose as the number of adversities rose. Notably, most of these adversities were avoidable.

For more information, see Vol. 18, No. 3 of the Children’s Mental Health Research Quarterly.

Existing mental health conditions make youth more vulnerable to opioid use disorder

Opioid use disorders, like most mental disorders, have complex origins. Determining modifiable risk factors is particularly crucial in informing early intervention efforts. Findings from three large studies that included participants who were 18 years or younger shed light on these risk factors.

An Alberta study examined the link between mental disorders and the later development of opioid use disorder in nearly 2,000 young people aged 18 to 25 years. Researchers identified young adults with opioid use disorder in provincial health administrative databases. Individuals were then matched based on age and sex with more than 7,000 individuals without this diagnosis. Researchers found that alcohol use, anxiety and depressive disorders predicted the development of opioid use disorder. Alcohol use disorder was particularly potent, increasing risk more than sixfold, while anxiety and depressive disorders each more than doubled the risk.

A US study involved nearly 77,000 youth aged 14 to 18 years who were enrolled in a Colorado health maintenance organization. Researchers first identified 108 youth who had opioid use disorder and then identified preceding risk variables. Having a substance use disorder or using substances resulted in about five times higher likelihood of being diagnosed with opioid use disorder. And having other mental health diagnoses (i.e., anxiety, adjustment, conduct, depressive and/or eating disorders) resulted in four times higher likelihood.

The third study was a survey of more than 41,000 youth who were representative of American 12- to 17-year-olds — and highlighted similar risks. Past-year substance use and depression were both risk factors for developing prescription opioid use disorder. Specifically, the odds of developing this disorder increased by 522% for “illicit” drug use; 176% for cannabis use; 102% for alcohol use; and 237% for depression.

Taken together, the findings of these three studies demonstrate that mental health conditions confer considerable extra risk for young people regarding opioid misuse.

For more information, see Vol. 18, No. 3 of the Children’s Mental Health Research Quarterly.

You can support child and youth mental health on May 7

Small moments of care can make a big difference. That’s the message behind Child and Youth Mental Health Day, marked annually on May 7.

Child and Youth Mental Health Day advocates for meaningful conversations about mental health between children and the caring adults in their lives. It raises awareness and works to break down stigma that prevents families from accessing mental health services.

The day was established by FamilySmart, a BC-based organization, in 2007.

This year, FamilySmart is partnering with the BC School Counsellors Association to host a special online event that shares experiences, insights and practical ways to support the mental health of children and youth. You can learn more and access resources on FamilySmart’s website.

Beyond raising awareness, providing effective mental health treatment is an important way we can support young people who are struggling. But stark shortfalls persist in specialized mental health treatment services for Canadian children and youth.

Barriers to access include a lack of trained practitioners (particularly in remote communities), long waiting lists, stigma and the need to travel long distances to access care. Novel treatment approaches that address these barriers, including self-delivered treatments accessed online, may be an effective way to reach more children in need.

To learn more, see Vol. 14, No. 2 of the Children’s Mental Health Research Quarterly.

Why Canada needs better data on children with incarcerated parents

A new study reveals that thousands of kids across Canada have experienced parental incarceration — and that number is likely an underestimate.

Developed by a team of researchers from across the country, the CHIRP (Children with IncarceRated Parents) study is the first in Canada to systematically estimate the number of children impacted by parental incarceration. Nicole Catherine, Associate Director of the Children’s Health Policy Centre, was a co-investigator.

The research team identified nearly 170,000 children across five Canadian provinces who experienced parental incarceration between 2015 and 2021. They found that approximately 1 in 100 children (1.2%) per year in Alberta, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, Ontario and Saskatchewan had been affected.

This study sheds light on a vulnerable population of young people made statistically invisible by a lack of data.

Parental incarceration undermines children’s rights — particularly their rights to family life and to have their best interests upheld. This underscores the need for policies that prioritize children’s best interests, including in sentencing, maintaining parent–child contact, and strengthening supports for affected children.

Parental incarceration is also considered an adverse childhood experience, and research shows that children who experience it tend to have worse mental and physical health than their peers. In order to support these children, policymakers and communities need access to valid data about them.

But prior to this study, there were no credible estimates of the number of children affected by parental incarceration in Canada.

According to the authors, this data gap has hindered “policy and program development, and public, political, and media interest” in these children.

The study stresses that even the statistics used to compile it have limitations, and the findings should be treated as minimum estimates — meaning many more children may be affected.

“While further research is needed to fully quantify the prevalence and burden of this adverse childhood experience, these minimum estimates can be used to raise awareness of the issue of parental incarceration in Canada,” the study concludes.

“Evolving evidence, including this study, is instrumental to advancing work to measure, prevent, and mitigate the harms associated with parental incarceration for children and families.”

Read the full paper to learn more.

The ongoing risks of opioids for BC youth

Nearly 200 BC youth aged 18 years or younger died in the past decade after using unregulated toxic drugs — especially opioids. In fact, in 2023, 84.8% of these deaths involved fentanyl and 20.6% involved other opioids. (The total exceeds 100% because more than one substance was often identified for a given individual.) Between 2019 and 2023, unregulated drug toxicity was the leading cause of unnatural deaths for youth in BC (i.e., deaths not due to a disease).

Research evidence is also emerging that adolescents are at particular risk for death from opioids. Among people in BC with an opioid use disorder who received at least one prescription for an opioid agonist, a medication used to treat this condition, those younger than 20 years had the highest relative risk of death of any age group.

Parallel with increasing opioid deaths, more BC youth are being diagnosed with opioid use disorder. In 2017, 285 young people between 12 and 18 years received such a diagnosis according to records from health administrative sources, a quintupling since 2007. The actual number of youth with an opioid disorder is likely an underestimate given that this condition frequently goes undiagnosed. Hypotheses for this underdiagnosing include limited practitioner training and stigma around substance use.

For more information, see Vol. 18, No. 3 of the Children’s Mental Health Research Quarterly.

Exploring nurses’ perspectives of an enhanced family visiting program in British Columbia, Canada (manuscript in preparation)

Catherine, N.L.A., Lever, R.L., White, O., Tang, J., Thomson, K. (2025). Exploring nurses’ perspectives of an enhanced family visiting program in British Columbia, Canada. Vancouver, British Columbia: Childrens Health Policy Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University. Report (manuscript in preparation).

Continue reading

Exploring clients’ perspectives of an enhanced family visiting program, in British Columbia, Canada (manuscript in preparation)

Catherine, N.L.A., Lever, R.L., White, O., Tang, J. (2026). Exploring clients’ perspectives of an enhanced family visiting program, in British Columbia, Canada. Vancouver, British Columbia: Childrens Health Policy Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University. Report (manuscript in preparation).

Continue reading

Early Indicators, Early Evidence. Rapid Framework for Monitoring and Evaluating Maternal-Child Outcomes (manuscript in preparation)

Catherine N, Barican J, Tang JWhite O, & Thomson K. (2026). Early Indicators, Early Evidence. Rapid Framework for Monitoring and Evaluating Maternal-Child Outcomes. Vancouver, British Columbia: Children’s Health Policy Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University. Report (manuscript in preparation).

Continue reading

Early interventions can help prevent opioid misuse before it starts

Research identified through a systematic review by the Children’s Health Policy Centre indicates that it is possible to avert opioid misuse by focusing on prevention in childhood. Evidence for the US-based Strengthening Families program was particularly compelling, with three studies showing that the program significantly reduced prescription opioid misuse over 12 to 14 years of follow-up. These enduring benefits likely conferred protection during important periods of child and adolescent development. Project PATHS also reduced the frequency of heroin use two years after the program ended, according to one study.

These findings suggest five implications for practice and policy.

  • Intervene early. Both successful programs began in Grade 6 or 7, when most children were only 11 or 12 years old. So efforts to prevent opioid misuse need to start before adolescence, the time when young people are more likely to first try an opioid.
  • Empower parents. Strengthening Families recognized the crucial roles that parents play in supporting children and strengthening their resilience. Therefore, practitioners should always consider including parents (and other caregivers) in opioid prevention programs.
  • Reach more children by delivering programs efficiently. Both programs reached large numbers of children — more than 12,000 in one Strengthening Families study — while enhancing efficiencies through group delivery. The use of school settings added to the efficiencies. Training for facilitators and teachers was also concise — just two days for Strengthening Families and three days for Project PATHS. These approaches can be models for reaching more children and youth across BC.
  • Take a broad approach to prevention. Strengthening Families originally aimed to prevent substance misuse in general, while Project PATHS aimed to promote positive development and reduce problem behaviours. Focusing on more than opioids likely played a role in Strengthening Families reducing the use of cannabis, ecstasy, cocaine, methamphetamine and LSD, and Project PATHS reducing the use of cannabis, ecstasy, ketamine and solvents. Addressing factors that apply to all substances, such as building refusal skills, likely contributed to success in reducing prescription drug misuse, even without opioid-specific content.
  • Build on successful programs to grow the options in BC. The programs we reviewed were delivered in the 1990s or 2000s, which could result in materials requiring updates. Strengthening Families has already been updated; the current version of this program includes new material, such as information on prescription drug misuse, as well as a video series and updated handouts. Project PATHS may also require updating to ensure the content is current. In addition, adaptations may be needed for the Canadian context and for cultural relevance, given that Strengthening Families was mainly evaluated with white American children and Project PATHS with children from Hong Kong. As well, made-in-BC evaluations are needed to confirm the benefits here.

For more information, see Vol. 18, No. 2 of the Children’s Mental Health Research Quarterly.